And so hundreds moved into the boarding houses which were run for profit with minimal or no accountability or monitoring. People with sometimes serious conditions, such as schizophrenia, went from the state being in charge of their welfare to a boarding house owner.
The state passed a law to license boarding houses that accommodated people with psychological or intellectual disabilities. But three Ombudsman's reports in nine years - two of them secret and the latest delivered to the Minister for Disability Services last month - testify to the failure of the responsible government department, Ageing, Disability and Home Care, to do its job of inspecting and monitoring the boarding houses properly.
A weak law, and some aggressive licensees, did not help the hapless bureaucrats in their role of protecting and improving the lives of the vulnerable residents.It is time the state government took a serious look at boarding houses, both the licensed kind, and the unlicensed, which cater to a slightly different clientele of poor, single tenants often with alcohol and gambling addictions.
Sunday, July 24, 2011
Privatization of the care of vulnerable people
images by Simon Bosch, courtesy of the Sydney Morning Herald
State and Federal Governments of all persuasion continue their love affair with "market based approaches" to the provision of health services and human and community services.
These market based approaches take many forms, including privatization and contracting out of government services, competitive tendering of services to not-for- profit and for profit agencies, increasing use of for-profit providers and the private sector to provide services, use of user pay and cost recovery principles, the application of business metrics and the imposition of corporate management models and approaches that have their origins in the for- profit business context.
But they all are predicated on the assumption that applying market principles to the delivery of health and human and community services will drive innovation, deliver greater efficiency and better quality services and save Governments money.
Adele Horin's piece in the Sydney Morning Herald Sad Truth behind Closed Doors is further evidence of the dangers of relying on market based and for- profit approaches in the delivery of health and human services. Horin shows that a reliance on market based approaches is a threat to the health and well being of vulnerable people.
Horin argues that the reliance on for- profit providers of boarding houses to accommodate and support people with mental illness has failed to protect and improve the lives of vulnerable people. Horin draws on the work of Sydney academic Gabriel Drake who calls the rise of licensed boarding houses in Sydney, as "the privatisation of the back wards".
In a study of inner Sydney licensed boarding houses, Drake describes a situation where large numbers of people with only their disability in common, live together with little to do, receive poor mental and physical health care, and have few chances to learn skills. Their pension is handed over. They can't afford a bus fare. They become highly dependent on the boarding house owner.
Horin describes how the failure by Governments to provide the funds and support to people with mental illness who were "de-institutionalized" and moved out of large psychiatric institutions meant that they were thrown to the vagaries of the "market"